2 Minutes with the President: Paula H. Holderman interviews Judge Mulroy about mandatory arbitration

ISBA President Paula H. Holderman interviews Cook County Judge Thomas Mulroy about the proposed mandatory arbitration program and the benefits it would have for both litigants and lawyers.

Posted on February 10, 2014 by Chris Bonjean
Filed under: 

Member Comments (2)

I like the concept, and I think in many cases preparation for trial will be unnecessary, which will effect certain cost savings. I question, however, whether the savings will be as substantial as one might hope. Especially in a commercial case, preparation for arbitration, although somewhat less extensive, will nevertheless be quite extensive. No client has ever commended me for losing the case so cheaply, and the specter of malpractice cannot be ignored.

Mandatory Arbitration would obviate the necessity for stultified proceedings, which serve only to multiply costs and fees. Pragmatic resolutions of the vast majority of cases would redound to a benefit to the public and enhance the image of the bar. Absent attorney posturing and folderol, issues would virtually self resolve.

Login to post comments